Professor wins £70,000 libel damages over false sex predator claims
Politics professor wins £70,000 libel damages over false claims he is a sex predator and rapist but his harasser has still not been identified
- Academic Paul Blackledge was accused of being a sexual predator and rapist
- The false claims were made by anonymous blogger ‘MeTooUCU’, court heard
- He has been awarded £70,000 in damages for the ‘gravely defamatory’ claims
- High Court judge also ordered Google to take down the website with the articles
- Dr Blackledge’s harasser has still not been identified after their hate campaign
An academic falsely accused of being a sexual predator and rapist by an anonymous blogger has been awarded £70,000 in damages by a High Court judge.
Paul Blackledge, a professor in politics and ethics, was accused of a series of serious sexual assaults in three articles published under a pseudonym on the BlogSpot blogging platform last year.
The High Court heard that the posts were published under the pseudonym ‘MeTooUCU’, a reference to the £MeToo movement and the University and College Union (UCU).
The articles falsely alleged Dr Blackledge, who has worked at universities in Leeds, London, Northumbria and China, was also guilty of rape as well as sustained bullying and the humiliation of his victims.
In a judgment on Thursday, Mr Justice Saini awarded the five-figure sum in damages, finding the allegations were false and ‘gravely defamatory’.
The damages are likely to be symbolic as the anonymous blogger’s identity remains unknown.
Paul Blackledge, a professor in politics and ethics, was accused of a series of serious sexual assaults in three articles published under a pseudonym on a blogging platform last year
He said: ‘I am satisfied on the evidence that the claimant has never committed any form of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or rape.
‘I also accept that he was devastated by these false allegations and finds the very idea of sexual violence abhorrent.’
The individual behind the website did not engage with the court or attempt to defend the allegations.
Mr Justice Saini said: ‘The defendant has used the anonymity of the internet and social media to hide.
‘The facts of this case are a striking example of how the internet and social media can be used to abuse and damage innocent individuals with apparent impunity.’
The judge said the blogger emailed Dr Blackledge’s professional contacts with the allegations as part of a ‘vindictive and relentless’ campaign over several months.
A High Court (pictured, stock image) judge ordered Google to take down the website with the articles and awarded Dr Blackledge £70,000 in damages – although this is largely symbolic as the blogger remains anonymous
The blogger also shared the articles with other academics through an anonymous Twitter account, leading the judge to conclude they had been seen between ‘the high hundreds to low thousands’ of times.
Mr Justice Saini said the allegations would have been ‘devastating’ to Dr Blackledge’s reputation.
He continued: ‘The claimant can barely sleep from the torment of the allegations and thinks about them all the time.
‘The website and emails have caused many who were previously close to the claimant to stop speaking to him completely.
‘Others have told the claimant they would have to distance themselves from him despite telling him they did not believe the allegations.’
Mr Justice Saini awarded a total of £70,000 to Dr Blackledge for libel and harassment.
‘This substantial sum is intended to reflect and signal the total falsity of the allegations against Paul Blackledge,’ he added.
The judge also ordered that Google, which hosts BlogSpot, must take down the website with the articles.
Source: Read Full Article